7 Days Free Trial; no credit card required
Chief Executive Officer
AI is transforming how banks meet complex regulatory standards, making compliance faster, more accurate, and less manual. Here's what you need to know:
Banks must balance innovation with responsibility, using AI for tasks like transaction monitoring, risk assessment, and automated reporting while adhering to evolving regulations. Staying compliant isn't just a legal necessity - it's a way to stay competitive in a rapidly changing industry.
By 2025, the regulatory landscape for banks has grown increasingly intricate, as traditional compliance rules are now augmented by emerging AI frameworks. The rapid adoption of AI within financial services has outpaced regulatory advancements, leaving institutions grappling with how to meet evolving legal standards. As of September 2024, 48 U.S. states and jurisdictions had begun drafting bills to regulate AI, signaling a nationwide effort to establish governance frameworks tailored to financial institutions. This shift highlights several critical areas of compliance that banks must address.
Banks are now tasked with managing AI-integrated processes in areas like anti-money laundering (AML), know-your-customer (KYC), and AI ethics. These domains demand that institutions ensure their AI tools meet stringent requirements for accuracy, fairness, and transparency.
New AI ethics regulations emphasize fairness, transparency, and security. Financial institutions must demonstrate that their AI models are free from bias and capable of explaining their decision-making processes to regulators.
Data protection laws have also evolved to address AI-specific challenges. Updates to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and California’s CCPA/CPRA now impose stricter limits on how banks collect, store, and use customer data for AI purposes. These laws, along with global privacy regulations, significantly shape how financial institutions handle data.
The economic stakes are high. McKinsey estimates that generative AI could contribute between $200 billion and $340 billion annually to the global banking sector through productivity gains. At the same time, spending on AI compliance and implementation is projected to surge - from $6 billion in 2024 to $9 billion in 2025, and potentially reaching $85 billion by 2030, according to Statista. These figures underscore the financial impact of adhering to stringent regulations.
For banks operating across borders, international AI standards add another layer of complexity. Compliance isn’t limited to domestic regulations; institutions must also navigate the laws of every jurisdiction where they operate, creating a multifaceted challenge.
Gartner reports that half of the world’s governments now require enterprises to adhere to a variety of laws, regulations, and data privacy standards to ensure AI is used responsibly. For multinational banks, this means developing adaptable AI systems that comply with diverse regulatory frameworks while maintaining consistent performance.
Transparency and explainability also remain key priorities. High-risk AI systems face rigorous pre-market evaluations, with banks required to clarify how their traditionally opaque algorithms make decisions.
The push for compliance is also driving innovation. Real-time monitoring of AI assets, risks, and regulatory requirements is now essential, prompting widespread adoption of regulatory technology (RegTech) solutions. Currently, 90% of financial institutions use these tools to manage compliance.
Looking ahead, regulators are expected to impose even stricter requirements, particularly in areas like data protection and cybersecurity. To keep up, banks must develop sustainable models that address critical issues such as data source traceability, business accountability, and robust privacy and security measures.
Banks are increasingly turning to AI to navigate the maze of regulatory requirements. With cybercrime costing the global economy $600 billion annually (about 0.8% of global GDP), and fraud attempts skyrocketing by 149% in the first quarter of 2021 compared to the previous year, the stakes are higher than ever. In 2022, more than half of financial institutions adopted AI-driven fraud detection systems, which have helped reduce false positives by as much as 70%. These AI solutions are also transforming key compliance areas like transaction monitoring, automated reporting, and risk assessment.
AI-powered transaction monitoring systems are replacing outdated rule-based methods. These systems analyze massive datasets in real time, identifying suspicious patterns that human analysts might miss, all while staying aligned with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) laws. For example, American Express boosted fraud detection rates by 6% using advanced LSTM models, while PayPal improved real-time fraud detection by 10% with AI systems.
A risk-based approach is crucial for effective transaction monitoring. This means tailoring monitoring rules and alert thresholds to match a bank's specific risk profile. Machine learning and behavioral analytics further enhance these systems, picking up anomalies that traditional methods often overlook. In 2021, Holvi teamed up with ComplyAdvantage to implement AI-driven risk detection. This partnership allowed Holvi to prioritize high-risk alerts, significantly improving team efficiency.
"The implementation of Smart Alerts was the smoothest implementation of tech that we have ever experienced. We did not experience any downtime or any interruption of business operations – not even for a second." – Valentina Butera, Head of AML & AFC Operations, Holvi
AI is also revolutionizing compliance reporting by automating document preparation, reducing errors, and speeding up submissions. These systems are designed to generate text-based reports, pinpoint key sections, and address compliance-related queries. For instance, Standard Chartered uses AI to enhance transaction monitoring for quicker detection of suspicious activities, while UBS employs AI chatbots to help compliance officers stay informed about procedures.
Grant Thornton Advisory Services has developed a generative AI tool tailored to specific risk definitions and compliance needs. This tool identifies gaps in risk and control frameworks and provides targeted recommendations for improvement.
"AI tools are useful in creating and testing Compliance Management System (CMS) programs because they can quickly match the most recent guidance provided by regulators to the bank's CMS plan and monitoring routines and ensure they align with any new or updated regulations." – Leslie Watson-Stracener, Managing Director and Regulatory Compliance Capability Leader, Grant Thornton Advisors LLC
AI’s role in compliance reporting goes beyond document creation. It assists with transactional testing for regulations like HMDA, TILA, and the Flood Disaster Protection Act by identifying exceptions and automating data entry. However, banks must validate data and maintain strong board oversight of AI practices to ensure regulatory alignment. Beyond reporting, AI plays a critical role in assessing overall compliance risk.
AI-driven risk assessment systems analyze large datasets in real time to detect patterns and anomalies that could indicate compliance risks. These systems also automate parts of the control design and assessment process, improving operational efficiency and bolstering confidence in compliance measures. Together, these advancements enhance a bank's risk assessment framework.
Currently, 44% of financial institutions are prioritizing AI investments in areas like fraud detection and security, recognizing its potential to strengthen risk management. However, a BioCatch survey revealed that 51% of financial institutions experienced losses ranging from $5 million to $25 million due to AI-related fraud and cybersecurity threats in 2023. While 73% of institutions believe AI can improve digital experiences, 54% express concerns about its impact, and less than half of consumers feel comfortable with their financial data being handled by AI.
To ensure effective AI risk assessment, banks need robust governance frameworks to keep AI models transparent, explainable, and aligned with evolving regulations. Policies on data security, compliance, and third-party oversight are equally important. Generative AI tools can assist by identifying exceptions and automating data entry in line with current regulatory guidelines. Incorporating review and override mechanisms - where human experts can step in when necessary - ensures a balanced, human-in-the-loop approach to risk management.
For banks looking to streamline compliance workflows, platforms like prompts.ai (https://prompts.ai) offer real-time collaboration, automated reporting, and multi-modal AI capabilities to simplify regulatory adherence.
As banks adopt AI to streamline compliance, implementing it ethically is just as important. Ethical AI ensures fairness, transparency, and accountability, which are critical for maintaining customer trust while meeting regulatory standards. In 2023, financial institutions invested $35 billion in AI technologies, with projections suggesting this will rise to $97 billion by 2027.
However, ethical challenges, along with cost and technical skill limitations, often hinder the adoption of generative AI. According to KPMG, only 16 out of 50 banks have established Responsible AI (RAI) principles, highlighting a gap between AI use and ethical frameworks. This gap poses risks for both banks and their customers.
AI bias in banking can lead to serious consequences, especially in lending and credit decisions. A 2021 Federal Reserve study revealed that some algorithmic systems used in mortgage underwriting denied applications from minority borrowers at higher rates than non-minorities. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director Rohit Chopra referred to this as "digital redlining" and "robot discrimination".
Banking AI systems are vulnerable to several types of bias:
| Bias Type | Definition | Banking Example |
|---|---|---|
| Historical Bias | Inequalities from past data embedded in AI training | A credit scoring model may favor certain demographics if a bank historically approved more loans for them. |
| Selection Bias | When training data doesn’t represent the entire population | An algorithm trained only on high-income borrowers may misjudge applicants with non-traditional incomes. |
| Algorithmic Bias | Overemphasis on certain variables leading to skewed outcomes | Overweighting zip codes in lending could cause geographic discrimination against marginalized groups. |
| Interaction Bias | User interactions introduce bias into the system | Loan officers frequently overriding recommendations for specific groups could lead to systematic exclusion. |
In 2023, iTutorGroup faced a lawsuit from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission after its AI system excluded thousands of job applicants based solely on age, illustrating the legal and operational risks of bias.
To address bias, banks should adopt strategies such as building diverse teams across data science, business, HR, and legal departments. Regular audits of AI models, transparent algorithm development, and monitoring for data drift are also essential. Additionally, using diverse datasets and incorporating governance structures can help mitigate bias effectively.
Transparency is key to building trust in banking AI. As Federal Reserve Governor Lael Brainard pointed out, some algorithms are so complex that even their creators may struggle to explain their decisions. To ensure trustworthiness, financial institutions must make AI outputs explainable, fair, and compliant with evolving regulations.
"Things like explainable AI, responsible AI and ethical AI, which defend against events like unplanned bias, are no longer being seen as optional but required for companies that leverage ML/AI, and specifically where they host customers' personal data."
- Brian Maher, Head of Product for AI and Machine Learning Platforms at JPMorgan Chase
Banks should document AI decisions thoroughly, detailing data sources, algorithms, and performance metrics for both regulators and customers [40, 44]. A Deloitte report on "Digital Ethics and Banking" found that customers are more willing to share their data when they understand its purpose, how it will be used, and how it benefits them. Practical steps include adopting explainable AI techniques, conducting regular audits, and maintaining clear documentation of decision-making processes. Tools like decision traceability logs, confidence scores, and user-friendly performance metrics can also help bridge the gap between technical and non-technical stakeholders.
Structured oversight further strengthens these transparency measures, ensuring accountability at every stage.
Effective oversight is critical for managing AI responsibly. Despite the growing use of AI, 55% of organizations lack an AI governance framework, and nearly 70% plan to increase investments in governance over the next two years [40, 41]. McKinsey notes that companies with centralized AI governance are twice as likely to scale AI responsibly and effectively.
Governance should start with senior leadership and include a dedicated AI ethics committee. As Charlie Wright from Jack Henry emphasized, "When it comes to AI, compliance and accountability are more than regulatory obligations – they are commitments to your accountholders' trust and the integrity of your financial institution".
Key elements of successful governance frameworks include centralized processes for submitting, reviewing, and approving AI initiatives, as well as automated workflows to identify and mitigate risks. Human oversight remains essential, with banks needing to offer AI training programs, cross-functional education, and open discussions about AI risks [33, 45].
The Apple Card controversy in 2019 serves as a cautionary tale. Apple and Goldman Sachs faced backlash when the card’s algorithm allegedly assigned lower credit limits to women compared to men with similar financial profiles, prompting an investigation by New York’s Department of Financial Services. To prevent such incidents, banks should implement tools to detect and quantify bias, measure fairness using metrics like equalized odds, and flag problematic training data or model features.
Platforms like prompts.ai provide automated reporting and multi-modal AI workflows, helping banks maintain transparency and accountability throughout the AI lifecycle. By prioritizing ethical considerations, banks can align innovation with regulatory compliance and customer trust.
Developing a forward-thinking approach to AI compliance isn't just a good idea - it's essential for long-term success. The regulatory environment for AI in banking is evolving quickly, and financial institutions must stay ahead of these changes. As Dennis Irwin, Chief Compliance Officer at Alkami, puts it:
Compliance officers should evaluate ways to mitigate current risk while preparing for changes to regulations in the coming years.
With machine learning accounting for 18% of the banking industry's total market, being proactive about regulatory planning isn't just about compliance - it's about staying competitive.
Banks that want to thrive in this shifting landscape need to move from small-scale AI pilot projects to comprehensive, enterprise-wide strategies. This shift allows them to adapt to new regulations without sacrificing efficiency. The focus should be on creating systems that can evolve, ensuring compliance while maintaining operational excellence.
Keeping up with regulatory changes requires a deliberate and organized approach. For example, the EU AI Act, which is set to take effect soon, is expected to shape global regulatory standards. For banks operating across borders, it's critical to stay informed about both domestic and international regulations that could impact their AI initiatives.
To do this, banks should establish teams dedicated to tracking regulatory updates. These teams should monitor announcements from key regulatory bodies like the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, as well as international organizations and data privacy authorities. Areas that demand close attention include governance frameworks, expertise requirements, model risk management, and oversight of third-party AI providers. Implementing systems to categorize regulatory changes by their potential impact, timeline, and required organizational adjustments will help institutions stay ahead.
One of the biggest hurdles to regulatory compliance in the AI era is outdated technology. Legacy systems can limit a bank's ability to scale AI projects, making modernization an urgent priority. Transitioning to cloud-based infrastructure and upgrading data systems can pave the way for improved compliance.
Modernizing data platforms ensures that banks can provide the real-time monitoring, audit trails, and documentation regulators require. This process isn't just about new technology - it's about aligning AI initiatives with business goals. Each AI application should be evaluated individually to assess its risk and reward, and cross-functional teams should be involved throughout the AI model lifecycle.
Platforms like prompts.ai offer tools to simplify these efforts, including automated reporting and multi-modal AI workflows. Their pay-as-you-go infrastructure and interoperability with large language models allow banks to adapt to regulatory changes without overhauling their systems.
In a world of uncertain regulations, flexibility is key. Laura Kornhauser, co-founder and CEO of Stratyfy, explains:
Developing a flexible compliance framework isn't about predicting every rule change. It's about staying informed, utilizing modular policies, conducting scenario-based assessments and actively engaging with regulators.
Banks should adopt modular policies that can adjust to new regulations, conduct scenario-based assessments to prepare for various outcomes, and maintain detailed audit trails to demonstrate proactive risk management. Documenting compliance changes is essential for transparency and accountability.
Engaging directly with regulators is another critical step. By involving regulators early in AI project deployments, banks can gather feedback, align their initiatives with regulatory expectations, and build trust.
Leslie Watson-Stracener, Managing Director at Grant Thornton Advisors LLC, also emphasizes the importance of board oversight:
Always make sure your board has oversight of your AI practices. And test your results. Even when an AI tool may be doing the heavy lifting of analyzing data or comparing information, you should still build sampling and checking for anomalies into your process.
Ultimately, flexible compliance procedures aren't just about meeting regulations - they're about staying competitive. As Kornhauser puts it:
Navigating regulatory change isn't just about staying compliant - it's about staying competitive.
Integrating AI into banking requires a careful balance between embracing innovation and maintaining responsibility. With machine learning now accounting for 18% of the banking market, treating compliance as an afterthought is simply not an option. Banks bear the ultimate responsibility for adhering to regulations - even when leveraging third-party AI models. The Interagency Statement on Model Risk Management underscores this point:
"Banks are ultimately responsible for complying with BSA/AML requirements, even if they choose to use third-party models".
Ethical challenges also loom large in AI adoption. According to a KPMG report, issues like ethics, cost, and technical expertise are among the biggest hurdles. Despite growing awareness, only 16 out of 50 banks surveyed have implemented principles for responsible AI, revealing a gap between acknowledgment and action. To bridge this divide, banks must incorporate key compliance measures - such as training, testing, monitoring, and auditing - into their AI strategies. Industry leaders stress the importance of explainable, responsible, and ethical AI practices, particularly when dealing with sensitive customer data. These ethical priorities make it clear that strong, adaptable governance is no longer optional.
Building a solid governance framework is essential. Boards must actively oversee AI initiatives to ensure accountability and alignment with regulatory expectations. As regulations evolve, banks will need to remain flexible while maintaining rigorous oversight.
Charlie Wright captures the essence of this responsibility:
"When it comes to AI, compliance and accountability are more than regulatory obligations – they are commitments to your accountholders' trust and the integrity of your financial institution".
To make sure AI decision-making stays fair and unbiased, banks need to implement a Responsible AI framework. This approach prioritizes principles such as fairness, transparency, and privacy. It also emphasizes using diverse datasets to reduce the risk of unintended discrimination tied to factors like gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic background.
In addition, banks should create clear governance policies and assemble multidisciplinary teams to conduct regular audits of their AI systems. These audits are essential for spotting and addressing potential biases, ensuring compliance with both regulatory requirements and ethical standards. By committing to accountability and ongoing improvements, banks can strengthen trust in their AI systems and ensure fair treatment for all customers.
To navigate international regulations effectively, banks need a clear plan for managing AI systems. Start by building a strong AI governance framework. This framework should guide compliance efforts and ensure alignment with both local and international standards. It’s a good idea to set up specialized teams or committees to handle regulatory requirements and oversee AI-related activities.
Regular risk assessments are another key step. These help identify potential regulatory hurdles and assess how AI systems influence operations in different regions. Pair this with ongoing monitoring and auditing of AI models to confirm they’re working as intended and staying compliant with evolving rules. Keeping decision-making processes transparent and maintaining thorough documentation can also help demonstrate compliance to regulators.
Taking these steps not only reduces risks but also strengthens relationships with regulators and supports smooth operations across borders.
Banks can tap into the potential of AI by setting up robust data governance frameworks and ensuring transparency in its application. This means adhering to regulatory requirements - not just to sidestep legal troubles, but also to earn customer trust. Establishing clear rules for data collection and usage, while prioritizing customer consent, plays a key role in protecting sensitive information.
Taking a privacy-first approach can also give banks a competitive edge, helping to strengthen their reputation in the market. By committing to ethical AI practices and regularly monitoring AI systems, financial institutions can strike the right balance between innovation and the responsibility to protect customer data. This approach keeps trust at the heart of their AI-driven efforts.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Maecenas ac velit pellentesque, feugiat justo sed, aliquet felis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Maecenas ac velit pellentesque, feugiat justo sed, aliquet felis.
